Publication ethics and publication malpractice statement:

An editor evaluate manuscripts for their intellectual content regardless to race, gender, sexual orientation, religious belief, ethnic origin, or supporting philosophy of the authors.

Reviews should be conducted neutrally. Personal investigation of the author is unsuitable. Referees should state their views clearly with supporting opinion.

Reviewers should identify related published work that has not been cited by the authors. Any declaration that an observation, derivation, or argument had been formerly reported should be accompanied by the relevant citation. A reviewer should also call to the editor's attention any considerable resemblance or overlap between the manuscript under consideration and any other published paper of which they have personal knowledge.

The authors should guarantee that they have written completely original works, and if the authors have used the work and/or words of others that this has been properly cited.

Manuscripts submitted must not have been published as copyrighted material somewhere else. Manuscripts under review by the Journal should not be submitted for consideration by other publication as copyrighted material. By submitting a manuscript, the author(s) concur that the copyright will be transferred to Journal if the manuscript and associated multimedia are accepted for publication.